marisatomay:

marisatomay:

might be my prudish catholic upbringing jumping out but imho makeup companies shouldn’t name their products after explicit sexual terms

just my opinion but if the makeup industry is going to market towards young girls who haven’t even hit puberty yet and insist that they have hundreds of dollars with of high end makeup then they cannot name their products things like ‘climax’ and ‘super orgasm’ or even make puns like ‘glow job’ or claim in bold letters that the mascara is ‘sex proof’ when these young girls have no idea what any of these terms mean and frankly they shouldn’t understand the meaning behind an eyeshadow called ‘daddy’s girl’ or a blush called deep throat it’s all part of the hyper-sexualization of young girls and it’s just getting worse and worse in this new age of instagram/youtube mua’s where girls as young as 8 years old are being pressured into having a beat face that makes them look my age

but that’s just my opinion

If it’s marketed toward grown women, I don’t have too much of a problem with it, like Nars can keep their orgasm blush and it’s fine with me because it’s marketed to grown ass woman so w/e (though whoever has the Better Than Sex mascara we need to talk because that shit’s meaningless to my asexual ass I mean you aren’t marketing it to me, but you might as well have said it’s better than idk post-it notes or better than zipper pulls or better than the city of Cleveland or something for all I give a crap that it’s better than sex  but htat’s just me don’t go by me) 

But if Too-Faced is going to have packaging that looks like something out of Polly fuckdamn Pocket they have no business having shade names that are innuendos I mean wtf. And what child can afford kawaii shit in the first place like wtf who is this for?