weresehlat:

grouch314:

hot4triangle:

sssn-neptune-vasilias:

points-at-my-hand:

Ever wonder how big wolves are and why running from them is a really bad idea?

This had me so fucked up the first time I worked at the zoo. Because honestly they just look like big German-Huskies when they’re not wild. They look like big puppies. And then… they get close to you… And it’s suddenly kinda fucking terrifying. Like “oh this is the animal that used to scare people shitless.” “This is the animal that used to run through nightmares and poems so much.” And you suddenly fucking get it. As cool as these animals are far away, as important as the animals are in their natural environment, as much as we need them to survive… they’re still pretty fucking terrifying 

can you believe these things became our friends

And then people domesticated them and now sleep with them in their beds.

We’re not a species meant to last

I’d actually argue the opposite!

We took these super efficient killing machines and befriended them and now they love and protect us as much as we (ideally) love and protect them

Cats basically domesticated themselves so that they could share in our food, medical care, and affection

In urban spaces, prey species know that there’s a higher likelihood that humans will help you if you’re stuck or injured than them killing or maiming you

It’s just, over time we see trends of our species overcoming environmental pressures that would and do lead to extinction in other species by sharing and forming close bonds with other sentient organisms and just kinda… aggressively community-bonding our way out of it?

For a long time there’s been this pervading idea that we, as a species, are just innately violent and terrible and “sinful” and it’s been that violence that let us survive (see the hunting hypothesis of human evolution). But that’s not what we see

We are, at our core, a species that looks into the face of something other, and thinks “I wonder if they want to be friends?” so long as the individual isn’t actively trying to kill us. Sure, tons of people do awful things every day, but for every terrible act or thought on this Earth, there are a dozen acts of kindness that people do casually for complete strangers

So yeah. We looked at these massive fluffy monsters with the sharp claws and crushing jaws rooting in our garbage just beyond the campfire and thought, the way no other species before or after us has done to the same extent; “They look friend-shaped!”

And they were. And that is how we got to be the dominant species on this planet

In the next 3 weeks, Canada will make a decision that could save the bees for good

wendigorunner:

lgbt-moodboards:

radfemsideblog:

dorianshavilliard:

parttimeperfectionist:

um guys?

canada is currently considering banning imidacloprid, which is apparently “one of the most widely used bee-killing pesticides in the world”. this seems pretty huge, so if you’ve got two seconds, add your name to the list! as of posting this link, they need just over 8,000 more signatures by february 21!

@allthecanadianpolitics

I DON’T CARE IF YOU’RE AMERICAN
PLEASE REBLOG THIS SO THAT OTHER CANADIAN USERS CAN SEE IT

COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC BUT THIS IS IMPORTANT TO ME

Good luck, Canadian peeps.

In the next 3 weeks, Canada will make a decision that could save the bees for good

YOU KNEW GENE RODDENBERRY?! THAT IS SO AMAZING!! What was he like??

spockslash:

What was he like?

Complicated. Deeply flawed.

What was he like, speaking only from my personal interactions with him over the years 1966-1982?

Warm. Open-minded. Generous. Erratic. Fatherly. Inspirational.

I’m well aware I experienced only one or two sides of a multifaceted personality. Looking back with all I now know, I see him as neither hero nor villain, but as a very flawed person with an amazing vision, which I’m glad he passed on to the world. I’m glad I had a chance to know him.

nautica-the-savant:

marbledmartin:

thegrumpymathematician:

nunyabizni:

sarcasmsuitsme:

skypig357:

iswearimnotnaked:

hi hello CATS!!!! CANNOT!!!! BE VEGAN!!!!!

i cannot believe i have to fucking say this.

dogs are omnivore and IF YOUR VET APPROVES your pooch MAY be able to go on an APPROVED(!!!!!) commercial vegan dog food like the brand “v-dog” which has all the essential vitamins, protein, etc. (the oldest record winning dogs have been vegan)

cats are CARNIVORE and cannot fucking live on a vegan diet. a vet would laugh in your face and probably find some way to have your pet taken away from you because you’re obviously not fit to have an animal if you think you can feed a cat a diet based on your own ethics

i’m vegan but this is so fucking harmful.

it’s about minimizing your harm, not putting your animals on risky diets in an attempt to be perfect.

DON’T FUCKING DO THIS TO YOUR PETS

Idiot people

If you see someone you know doing this, report them for animal cruelty and neglect.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This posts, and many of the notes on it, are bothering me. Ladies, gentlemen, esteemed colleagues from outside the confines of the gender binary; gather ‘round. Let’s throw some science in this joint.

1. Humans. Humans are not cats. Humans are not dogs. One would think this obvious, but people have a tendency to attempt such interspecies comparisons when discussing diet. Humans are order omnivora; we have essentially evolved in a manner that attempts to give us as much dietary flexibility as possible. We do, however, require a substance called B12 (or cobalamin), which is extremely important for brain and nervous system functions, as well as the synthesis of DNA and the construction of red blood cells. We cannot produce this vitamin ourselves–no animal, plant, or fungus can. The enzymes used in cobalamin production are essentially unique to bacteria and archaea–some species of which hang out in the digestive tracks of other animals. We get cobalamin in a roundabout way from fish, shellfish, meat, eggs, milk, and dairy products. While there is no naturally-occurring, vegan source of the vitamin that has been demonstrated effective in a human study of statistically significant sample size, effective synthetic forms do exist and can be used as a substitute.  Cyanocobalamin is one of the most common and is frequently found in fortified foods and vitamins. In short: Humans are omnivores. Humans have evolved for dietary flexibility, including viable vegetarianism. Humans did not evolve for veganism (be extremely suspicious of people who tell you that we did, as they are lying), but due to modern technologies, veganism is also a viable diet that humans can thrive on, should they so choose.

2. Cats. Cats are order carnivora. Cats require (amongst other things) an amino acid called taurine. We’re not quite sure how, exactly, but we know that it’s extremely important to feline heart wall tissue, retinal tissue, and brain tissue amongst other things. Cats cannot manufacture their own taurine, and must get it from other sources–primarily shellfish, fish and meat. Taurine breaks down when heated, so feeding your cat a home-cooked diet rich in this foods is also not necessarily a good idea (talk to a vet). Secondary (read: SUPPLEMENTARY. NOT A SOLE SOURCE OF TAURINE.) sources of taurine for cats include dairy, eggs, and seaweed- or yeast-based taurine supplements. In nature, cats don’t really need to worry about getting enough taurine, because (as you may have noticed), taurine sources are indeed the things that cats tend to catch and eat. However, a cat that lives in a human household is dependent on humans for food, and sometimes humans are utter fucktrucks. In short: Cats are obligate carnivores. Their primary source of nutrition is meat. They must eat meat, preferably as close to raw as possible. They have digestive tracks designed for digesting meat. There are vegan/vegetarian cat kibbles on the market. Do not buy them. Your cat is neither vegan nor vegetarian, and if you adjust their diet as if they were, you are a terrible person who is harming and possibly killing your pet. You suck. End of discussion.

3. Dogs. Dogs are slightly more nuanced here. They are facultative carnivores–meaning that they optimally should eat meat, but can survive on other things if resources are scare. Dogs also need the amino acid taurine, but can technically manufacture it themselves if the proper building blocks are in their diets. They also need vitamin D–D3 is preferable, but D2 can be used to some degree. Dogs are somewhere between us (the true omnivore) and the cat (the true carnivore). A vegan or vegetarian diet will keep a dog alive, certainly, but is unlikely to allow your pet to thrive as it lacks the recommended nutrients. You should probably be feeding your dog meat. The exception here–some dogs are allergic to conventional dog foods, or find symptoms of certain diseases alleviated by vegetarianism. In this case, a veterinarian (not you, layperson, I mean an actual trained veterinarian) may determine that the benefits of putting your dog on a vegetarian/vegan diet outweigh those of feeding your dog meat. This is relatively rare, but does occasionally happen. And no, actually, the oldest dog is not vegan–Bramble is the only dog on this list that I found had some indication of veganism. The oldest dog on record is an Australian Kelpie named Maggie, who was not vegan. It is more likely that Bramble lived that long despite the veganism, not because of it. In short: If a vet thinks that your dog may be allergic to dog food/require a special diet and recommends you try feeding it a vegetarian/vegan diet, listen to your vet. Otherwise? Dogs are carnivora. They do need vegetables and other sources of nutrients, but their optimal fuel, as it were, is meat. Your dog needs meat to be happy. Fucking feed your dog. 

Now, I did manage to find two veterinarians who disagree with every other study I dug up and the American Veterinary Medical Association. Their articles are here and here. They don’t really have sources, and are essentially wholly dependent on anecdotal evidence (“my dog is a vegetarian and hasn’t died!”), but for those of you data cherry-pickers reading this, there you go. 

As a rule, dogs and cats need meat. If that makes you uncomfortable, that is your problem, not theirs. If you try to implement a vegan or vegetarian diet for your pets because you implemented one for yourself, you shouldn’t have those pets. That is animal abuse. (By the way, those of you not feeding your cats and non-allergic dogs the food they need to survive and thrive? What the fuck is wrong with you? Do you not love your pets?)

TL;DR If you do not want a pet that must be fed meat, you should under no circumstances acquire a cat or a dog. Thank you for your time.

Rebloobing for the more detailed info on B12 and obligate carnivore vs true omnivores

Always reblog.

morthils:

hotpantslaurens:

deanscourse:

chongoblog:

opticbread:

scotchtapeofficial:

if millennials making fun of gen z becomes a meme i’m calling every one of you out for hypocrisy

there won’t be a gen z if those dumb kids keep eating fucking soap

Millenials planked on top of five story buildings bro. Every generation is fuckin dumb as hell

People in the 1950s stuffed themselves into phone booths, people just be like that

Hell, in the 1920s people climbed flagpoles and sat on them. Crazy dangerous stuff isn’t great, but it isn’t exclusively gen Z behavior

teens have always done dumb shit. today’s teens just happen to live in a world where they’re expected to publicly document their every move. 

do you really want more dynastic bs that only values people born into power in star wars? is that really, truly what you wanted with rey’s parentage

vintagetvfan:

leiasbluelightsaber:

What I really truly wanted with Rey’s parentage was a continuation of the story we already got in a way that would make Rey’s place in it narratively meaningful and emotionally satisfying. What I wanted was to see a complex and compelling father-daughter relationship in Star Wars. What I wanted was for the Skywalker legacy to be hope, not despair. And yes, what I wanted was a female heir to the most recognizable name in current cinema.

The Skywalkers were not born into power. They were born as slaves. Luke was a farmer on a dustball in the middle of nowhere. And even Leia, who was a princess, didn’t earn her place as a rebel leader by simply being Bail Organa’s daughter. She was a spy, a soldier, a valued operative. And as a senator, she didn’t have any power within the Empire. Interestingly enough, the only one this could apply to, as the son of two of the most famous people in the galaxy, is Kylo Ren. Yet he decided he wanted a completely different kind of power (for reasons unknown, I might add).

If by power you mean the Force, I don’t know what to tell you. The main conflict in SW will always be between the Dark and Light side of the Force. It’s what makes it so interesting in the first place. Do I think there should be more Force-users as main characters, aside from Rey and Kylo? Yes. But why should that mean the death of the Skywalkers?

As Carrie Fisher said, the fact that it’s all about family is what makes people drawn to these characters. It’s not about shocking revelations. It’s not about cool lightsaber battles. The lightsaber battles are only as interesting as the relationship between the people who fight them.

Can you honestly say you are satisfied with Rey’s parentage as it was presented? The girl who inherits all the important stuff from the old heroes, yet is not connected to them in any meaningful way. The girl who was abandoned by her parents, yet is unable to confront them. The girl who has all the Skywalker skills and Force powers, yet was apparently only born to ‘balance’ a Skywalker’s darkness. Is that really something people want for the first female lead in a Star Wars trilogy?

I’d like to point out that The Last Jedi was the middle film in a trilogy, and therefore what we learned there about Rey is not necessarily the final word.

Also: we heard it from Kylo Ren, who (need I remind you?) is a Sith lord trying to persuade Rey over to his side.  In other words, it’s not necessarily the truth!

That’s an interesting point because the reason there is a scene in ROTJ where Yoda confirms that Vader is Luke’s father is because supposedly a child psychologist told George Lucas that small children would assume that Vader, being a villain, was lying about it and needed to hear it confirmed by someone more reputable.

It wouldn’t surprise me if Kylo Ren was lying so the writers could subvert that idea.

tiredstarks:

rowdyravens:

Piece of media: here’s a female assassin

Me: nice

Piece of media: she kills her marks by seducing them and-

Me: *already asleep*

Like this a cool take and it makes sense but please,,,,stop,,, we’ve had enough after the first 30 please just give us a woman who just fucking punches and shoots shit

Me @ me can you not

I’m super tired and hissy again today as in

Because my creatures kept me up all night and my allergies are really bad and I guess I started dissociating on the stairs up to my boss’s office – idk I suddenly felt unreal like what if this is a dream and I’m still asleep and I’m late for work and going to get fired – and I nearly broke my damn neck when I missed a step.

It’s real alright.